Serials/Journals

See also the Slides and Recording of the 'Recording Serials and Journals' webinar

Recording retentions for serials is very similar to recording retentions for monographs.

The 583 is used with an additional normalized holdings statement in a subfield ‘3’. For EAST these will always be closed holdings, as libraries will be committing only to what they currently own. These holdings ranges may be extended at any time if the library so desires.  A breakdown of the marc 583 for EAST serials/journals is below. A single "committed to retain" 583 is required.

Example:

583 1b |a committed to retain |c 20160630 |d 20310630 |f EAST |3 v.1-V.50 (1951-2005) |u http://eastlibraries.org/retained-materials |5 MeWC

If a library is also doing validation of serials holdings, two additional 583s** may be used to record this information. These have the subfield ‘a’ of ‘condition reviewed’ or ‘completeness reviewed’. While validation is not required, most EAST Serials and Journals Partners have expressed a desire to do volume level validation of holdings before assigning retention commitments. This can be recorded in the subfield ‘i’ using either ‘volume-level’, issue-level’ or ‘page-level’ depending on the level of validation conducted. Subfield ‘l’, status, may also be used to note problems, e.g. gaps. See the preferred print archiving terms in the Preservation & Digitization Actions: Terminology for MARC 21 Field 583 (PDA), and note this terminology is used by including a subfield ‘2’ of pda . Use the ‡z Public Note to specify the physical units for which condition or completeness problems have been identified.

Here is a sample for a Colby College journal, committed to retain and with volume level validation done, and condition reviewed:

583 1b |a committed to retain |c 20160630 |d 20310630 |f EAST |3 v.1-v.50 (1951-2005) |u http://eastlibraries.org/retained-materials |5 MeWC

583 1b |a completeness reviewed |c 20181101 |f EAST |3 v.1-v.50 (1951-2005) |i volume-level |l missing volumes |z missing v.6-v.7 (1959-1960) |2 pda |5 MeWC 583 1b |a condition reviewed |c 20181101 |f EAST |3 v.1-v.6, v.8-v.50 (1951-1959, 1961-2005) |i volume-level |l v.1-v.2 tight bindings |5 MeWC

Here is a sample of a Completeness Reviewed 583 from the OCLC guidelines where the material is a reprint:

583 1# ‡3 v.1-v.50 (1951-2005) ‡a completeness reviewed ‡c 20110101 ‡f WEST  ‡i issue-level  ‡l reprints ‡z reprints v.3-v.5 (1951-1958) ‡2 pda ‡5 AzTeS 

*Table of preferred terms when recording condition:

***A quick note about LHR 008:     Position 16 of the LHR 008 is for completeness (https://www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd008.html)    This field should be used for the completeness of the run of a work, i.e. of a library holds v.1-4 of an 8 volume set, it should be coded as incomplete.      The 583 completeness reviewed statement refers only to a libraries holdings as expressed in the 583 subfield 3 or 8xx fields, and not to the entire run.  Thus a library can have a completeness reviewed statement showing that all held volumes are complete, and an 008 16 of 2 (incomplete) showing that they do not hold the complete run. 

**Example of multiple 583s from the OCLC guidelines